Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Hayes

Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Hayes

52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 3, 1894·No. No. 2455·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Minshall, Bradbury and Spear, JJ., dissent on the ground that the defendants in error were put upon inquiry as to the authority of the agent, . Adams, to indorse the note in suit, and should be held to have all information which proper inquiry would have shown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Hayes, 52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617 (Ohio 1894).

52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617 (Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.