Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Faber
38 N.Y.S. 1145, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 869
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 1896
StatusPublished
This text of 38 N.Y.S. 1145 (Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Faber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holmes, Booth & Hayden v. Faber, 38 N.Y.S. 1145, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).
Opinion
No opinion. Motion granted. See 37 N. Y. Supp. 427.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leonard v. Faber
37 N.Y.S. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 N.Y.S. 1145, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-booth-hayden-v-faber-nyappdiv-1896.