Holmes, Anwar Lammon
This text of Holmes, Anwar Lammon (Holmes, Anwar Lammon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,518-01
EX PARTE ANWAR LAMMON HOLMES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17852-A IN THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT FROM UPSHUR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to eighty
years’ imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Holmes v. State, No.
12-18-00359-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 30, 2019) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because he did not
object to improper jury argument. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 2
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,
the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 7, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holmes, Anwar Lammon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-anwar-lammon-texcrimapp-2020.