Holme v. Harrison

2 Whart. 283, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 173
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sergeant, J.

The devise to the widow of “ a house to live in,” is but a life-estate. The garden is an incident to the house ; and the same interest passes. As to the other property the testator devises to his wife “ one-third part of all the estate.” The words “ all the estate” are now well settled to be referable to the quantity of interest, and to pass the fee. They therefore give her a fee-simple in all the rest of the property not previously disposed of. In the first-mentioned premises, therefore, Frances Maghee had an estate for life. In the rest of the property referred to, she had a vested estate in fee-simple in one-third part thereof, which by the partition was allotted to her and her heirs, in the second-mentioned premises in the case stated; and therefore, in the second-mentioned premises, she had an estate in fee-simple. Judgment must be entered according to the case stated, for the plaintiff, for one-ninth of the first-mentioned premises ; and for the defendant for the second-mentioned premises.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holme v. Harrison, 2 Whart. 283, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 173 (Pa. 1837).

2 Whart. 283 (Holme v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howell v. Patry
50 N.J. Eq. 265 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1892)
Kearney v. Kearney
17 N.J. Eq. 59 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1864)