Holme v. Crimmins

City of New York Municipal Court

Holme v. Crimmins

31 Misc. 813, 63 N.Y.S. 1110

DecidedApril 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 813 (Holme v. Crimmins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holme v. Crimmins, 31 Misc. 813, 63 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Hascall, J.

We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary and should follow those ordered by the Special Term.

So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hascall, J.

We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary and should follow those ordered by the Special Term.

So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Misc. 813, 63 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holme-v-crimmins-nynyccityct-1900.