Holmberg v. Toomer

82 So. 620, 78 Fla. 116, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 14, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 82 So. 620 (Holmberg v. Toomer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmberg v. Toomer, 82 So. 620, 78 Fla. 116, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 421 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

— A petition for a writ of certiorari' alleges in effect that in. an action of assumpsit brought against the petitioners herein, the Civil Court of Record for Duval County rendered a judgment for the defendants .and that on writ of error taken’ to the Circuit Court, the judgment was reversed and .the cause remanded to the Civil Court of Record for further proceedings. A writ of certiorari is not a writ of right in all cases. See Harrison v. Frink, 75 Fla. 22, 77 South. Rep. 663; Benton v. State, 74 Fla. 30, 76 South. Rep. 314; Hunt v. City of Jacksonville, 34 Fla. 504, 16 South. Rep. 398; Ragland v. State, 55 Fla. 157, 46 South. Rep. 724; Edgerton v. Mayor Green Cove Springs, 18. Fla. 528; Dean v. Wilcoxon, 18 Fla. 531; Basnet v. City of Jacksonville, 18 Fla. 523; 6 Cyc. 748; 5 R. C. L. 254.

A judgment of the Circuit Court on writ of. error reversing a judgment of a lower court and remanding the cause to the lower court for further proveedings, is not a final adjudication of the cause; and the Supreme Court will not issue a writ of certiorari to such a judgment of the Circuit Court. See First National Bank v. Gibbs, decided at this term; 4 Standard Ency. Law & Pro. 892, 901

Writ denied.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Katz
108 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
The City of Miami v. Payne
14 So. 2d 387 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Robinson v. the City of Miami
190 So. 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Perlman v. Ryden
178 So. 911 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
The Seven Seas, Inc. v. Buckholtz
163 So. 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Bringley v. C. I. T. Corporation
160 So. 680 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Grodin v. Railway Express Agency
156 So. 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Kilgore v. Larry Dimmitt, Inc.
153 So. 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of Lakeland
150 So. 508 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Brinson v. Tharin
127 So. 313 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Broome
126 So. 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Waddell v. McAllister
122 So. 578 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Kroier v. Kroier
116 So. 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
American Railway Express Co. v. Weatherford
98 So. 820 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Coe-Mortimer Co. v. State
88 So. 475 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 620, 78 Fla. 116, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmberg-v-toomer-fla-1919.