Holmberg v. Sheriff's Office

279 A.D.2d 551, 719 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 567
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 551 (Holmberg v. Sheriff's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmberg v. Sheriff's Office, 279 A.D.2d 551, 719 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for violations of 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated September 29, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied his motion to serve an amended complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered November 5, 1999, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of an official policy or custom that caused him to be subjected to the denial of his constitutional rights (see, Monell v Department of Social Servs., 436 US 658; Mann v Alvarez, 242 AD2d 318; Jackson v Police Dept., 192 AD2d 641, cert denied 511 US 1004; Sagendorf-Teal v County of Rensselaer, 100 F3d 270).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bah v. City of New York
108 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
R.A.C. Group, Inc. v. Board of Education
295 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 551, 719 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmberg-v-sheriffs-office-nyappdiv-2001.