Holman v. Thomas
175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4209
This text of 175 F. 1021 (Holman v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holman v. Thomas, 175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4209 (2d Cir. 1910).
Opinion
This court must decline to interfere in any way with the relations between defendants’ counsel and his clients. Whether he shall con- - tinue to act for them or shall withdraw from the case is a matter for him to determine at his own risk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-thomas-ca2-1910.