Holman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Holman v. State

166 S.W. 503, 73 Tex. Crim. 576, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 22, 1914

DocketNo. 3100.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.W. 503 (Holman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holman v. State, 166 S.W. 503, 73 Tex. Crim. 576, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

HAEPEB, Judge.

Complaint was filed in the Beeorder’s Court of the city of Paris, and appellant was there convicted of violating a city ordinance. He appealed to the County Court, and was again tried and convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $20. Under the statutes of this State no appeal lies under such circumstances, and the appeal is therefore dismissed from the docket.

Dismissed.

Davidson, Judge, absent at consultation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAEPEB, Judge.

Complaint was filed in the Beeorder’s Court of the city of Paris, and appellant was there convicted of violating a city ordinance. He appealed to the County Court, and was again tried and convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $20. Under the statutes of this State no appeal lies under such circumstances, and the appeal is therefore dismissed from the docket.

Dismissed.

Davidson, Judge, absent at consultation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.W. 503, 73 Tex. Crim. 576, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack