Holman v. Reedom

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2001
Docket01-10100
StatusUnpublished

This text of Holman v. Reedom (Holman v. Reedom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holman v. Reedom, (5th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10100 Conference Calendar

BOBBY HOLMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES REEDOM,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CV-1760-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 13, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Reedom appeals from the district court’s order

remanding Reedom’s case to state court for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. Because this court lacks appellate jurisdiction to

review a district court’s remand order based on lack of subject

matter jurisdiction, this appeal is dismissed. See Albarado v.

Southern Pac. Transp. Co., 199 F.3d 762, 764 (5th Cir. 1999).

Reedom’s motions to show cause and for contempt are denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albarado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
199 F.3d 762 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Holman v. Reedom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-reedom-ca5-2001.