Holman v. Reedom
This text of Holman v. Reedom (Holman v. Reedom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10100 Conference Calendar
BOBBY HOLMAN,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES REEDOM,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CV-1760-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 13, 2001
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James Reedom appeals from the district court’s order
remanding Reedom’s case to state court for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Because this court lacks appellate jurisdiction to
review a district court’s remand order based on lack of subject
matter jurisdiction, this appeal is dismissed. See Albarado v.
Southern Pac. Transp. Co., 199 F.3d 762, 764 (5th Cir. 1999).
Reedom’s motions to show cause and for contempt are denied.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holman v. Reedom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-reedom-ca5-2001.