Holman v. Rasak
This text of 764 N.W.2d 573 (Holman v. Rasak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), PL 104-191,110 Stat 1936, permits ex parte interviews by defense counsel with treating physicians pursuant to a qualified protective order.
The motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is granted. The Michigan Association for Justice and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 N.W.2d 573, 483 Mich. 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-rasak-mich-2009.