Holman v. Clemson University

Fourth Circuit

Holman v. Clemson University

264 F. App'x 270

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2008·No. No. 07-1898·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roslyn Holman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her employment discrimination action alleging retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holman v. Clemson University, No. 4:05-cv-02727-TLW, 2007 WL 2455179 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roslyn Holman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her employment discrimination action alleging retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holman v. Clemson University, No. 4:05-cv-02727-TLW, 2007 WL 2455179 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Holman v. Clemson University, 264 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

264 F. App'x 270 (Holman v. Clemson University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.