Holman v. Brown

69 S.E. 1084, 8 Ga. App. 551, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 37
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1911·No. 2528·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell,'J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.-

2. “In every tort there may be aggravating circumstances, either in the aet or the intention, and in that event the jury may give additional damages, either to deter the wrong-doer from repeating the trespass, or as compensation for the wounded feelings of the plaintiff.” Civil Code of 1895, § 3906. The unlawful breaking of one’s house, the scattering of household goods, and the leaving of the doors unlocked, constitute such a tort as carries aggravation “in the aet,” and, therefore, authorize the assessment of damages additional to the actual property loss, irrespective of the intent with which the tort is committed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holman v. Brown, 69 S.E. 1084, 8 Ga. App. 551, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

69 S.E. 1084 (Holman v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. McNair & Sellers
114 S.E. 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. McElmurray
85 S.E. 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)