Holm v. Gilchrist
This text of 34 P. 1102 (Holm v. Gilchrist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an equity case, and upon the 4th day of January, 1893, the judge who tried the cause made a certificate to a statement of facts on appeal, stating that it contained all the testimony and objections and exceptions to the acceptance and rejection of testimony. This is precisely the state of facts passed upon in Clark-Harris Company v. Douthitt, 4 Wash. 405 (30 Pac. Rep.744).
The motion to strike must, therefore, prevail, and the appeal be dismissed.
Dunbar, C. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Anders, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 P. 1102, 7 Wash. 615, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holm-v-gilchrist-wash-1893.