Hollywood Shoe Polish, Inc. v. Knomark Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hollywood Shoe Polish, Inc. v. Knomark Mfg. Co.

4 A.D.2d 701, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 701 (Hollywood Shoe Polish, Inc. v. Knomark Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollywood Shoe Polish, Inc. v. Knomark Mfg. Co., 4 A.D.2d 701, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to restrain alleged unfair competition in the sale of white shoe polish and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as denied appellant’s motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to restrain alleged unfair competition in the sale of white shoe polish and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as denied appellant’s motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 701, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollywood-shoe-polish-inc-v-knomark-mfg-co-nyappdiv-1957.