Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood

300 So. 2d 10, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 26, 1974·No. No. 44859·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon hearing oral argument and consideration of the briefs in this cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists and that our writ of certiorari was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is discharged, but without prejudice to the [11]*11Petitioners’ enforcing any rights hereafter that they may have in order to be assured the platted lands involved herein which were granted to the City of Hollywood for public uses or purposes will be devoted to such uses or purposes, including enforcement of any reversionary rights of Petitioners if there is any abandonment of said lands hereafter.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 300 So. 2d 10, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4733 (Fla. 1974).

300 So. 2d 10 (Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.