Hollywood Community Synagogue v. City of Hollywood

873 So. 2d 527, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6985, 2004 WL 1103958
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-3116
StatusPublished

This text of 873 So. 2d 527 (Hollywood Community Synagogue v. City of Hollywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollywood Community Synagogue v. City of Hollywood, 873 So. 2d 527, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6985, 2004 WL 1103958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On certiorari review of the City of Hollywood Development Review Board’s decision to grant a special exception to permit Hollywood Community Synagogue to operate a house of worship on property zoned for single family use, the circuit court determined that the matter was moot because the limited special exception had expired. While this ruling was correct, the court made an additional determination that the Board erred in granting the special exception based upon administrative res judicata. The Synagogue has petitioned for certiorari review to this court. We dismiss the petition as moot because the special exception has expired, and a new special exception applied for by the Synagogue was denied by the City Commission, not on the ground of administrative res judicata, but because it failed to satisfy the requirements for granting a special exception. Thus, any determination of this court would have no practical effect, rendering the petition moot. See Du Bose v. Meister, 92 Fla. 995, 110 So. 546, 546-47 (1926) (refusing to review writ of prohibition entered in case where plaintiff sought cancellation of real estate license that had already expired, because “no practical result could be attained by reviewing the questions” presented); Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Newell’s Inc., 226 So.2d 858, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969) (dismissing appeal as moot because no practical results could be obtained by reviewing questions presented).

Dismissed as moot.

STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubose v. Meister
110 So. 546 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Gulf Life Insurance v. Newell's Inc.
226 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
873 So. 2d 527, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6985, 2004 WL 1103958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollywood-community-synagogue-v-city-of-hollywood-fladistctapp-2004.