Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 400, 55 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 324 F.2d 956
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 29, 1964·No. 20540_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On rehearing petitioner earnestly urges that the questions of (1) whether it refused to bargain in good faith on contract changes proposed by the union, (2) whether it refused to furnish to the union access to'pertinent wage date, and (3) whether its grant of a wage increase without consulting the union amounted to a violation of sections 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act presented issues of law rather than of fact as held in our per curiam opinion enforcing the order of the Board. 324 F.2d 956. We disagree. The law concerning all three questions is so well settled as not to justify further discussion. The only debatable question concerns the Board’s factual inferences and findings which, in our opinion, are supported by substantial evidence in the record. The petition for l'ehearing is

Denied,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 F.2d 400, 55 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6563 (5th Cir. 1964).

326 F.2d 400 (Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board
324 F.2d 956 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)