Holly v. Richtberg
This text of 199 A.D.2d 307 (Holly v. Richtberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), en[308]*308tered November 1, 1991, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs have raised triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212) as to whether the offending instrumentality was situated on the property owned by the defendants. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D.2d 307, 606 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holly-v-richtberg-nyappdiv-1993.