Holly v. Maricopa County
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 12, 2006
_______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21019 Summary Calendar _______________________
GENANA HOLLY,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
MARICOPA COUNTY; ET AL., Defendants,
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CV-1980 ________________________________________________________________
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court, having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs
and pertinent portions of the record, concludes there is no
reversible error in the district court’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law. We therefore AFFIRM the final judgment of the
district court essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holly v. Maricopa County (Holly v. Maricopa County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.