Holly v. Healy

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Holly v. Healy

119 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.Y.S. 1129 (Holly v. Healy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holly v. Healy, 119 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The answer of the defendant, attempting to plead the statute of limitations, is fatally defective, in that it fails to allege that six years had elapsed prior to the commencement of the action and since the cause of action accrued. It was not, therefore, available to the defendant as a defense, and the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint was error. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The answer of the defendant, attempting to plead the statute of limitations, is fatally defective, in that it fails to allege that six years had elapsed prior to the commencement of the action and since the cause of action accrued. It was not, therefore, available to the defendant as a defense, and the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint was error. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holly-v-healy-nyappterm-1909.