Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman

623 A.2d 1021, 225 Conn. 912, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 112
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 4, 1993·No. SC 14707·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 204 (AC 10746/11135), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the Underground Storage Tank Regulation, General Statutes § 22a-449, apply to a temporarily out-of-service facility?
“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, under the circumstances of this case did the failure of the plaintiff to comply with that regulation give rise to either a special defense or a private right of action in the defendants?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman, 623 A.2d 1021, 225 Conn. 912, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 112 (Colo. 1993).

623 A.2d 1021 (Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman
628 A.2d 1298 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)