Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker

Supreme Court of Florida

Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker

101 Fla. 181

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 Fla. 181 (Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker, 101 Fla. 181 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the decree of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, reversed; and this cause is remanded with directions to enter the usual decree, for the complainant for the amount found to be due complainant for principal and interest upon the purchase-money contracts and the further sum of $601.30 for care and maintenance of the groves and with a deduction from the amount found due complainant of $132.81 allowed defendant for fruit removed from the groves.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the decree of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, reversed; and this cause is remanded with directions to enter the usual decree, for the complainant for the amount found to be due complainant for principal and interest upon the purchase-money contracts and the further sum of $601.30 for care and maintenance of the groves and with a deduction from the amount found due complainant of $132.81 allowed defendant for fruit removed from the groves.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Fla. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holly-hill-grove-fruit-co-v-wicker-fla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack