Holly Copsuey Gruber v. General Motors LLC

District Court, C.D. California·Decided January 26, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-06989·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HOLLY COPSEY GRUBER, ) Case No. CV 23-6989 FMO (MAAx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, et al., ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 32, 17 Joint Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than March 19 25, 2024, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full 20 jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to 21 re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall 22 be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. 23 Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 24 Dated this 26th day of January, 2024. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holly Copsuey Gruber v. General Motors LLC, (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Holly Copsuey Gruber v. General Motors LLC (Holly Copsuey Gruber v. General Motors LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)