Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Hollowell v. Wark, Admx.

Hollowell v. Wark, Admx.

147 N.E. 170, 82 Ind. App. 618, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 261
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 2, 1925
DocketNo. 12,234.
StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.E. 170 (Hollowell v. Wark, Admx.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollowell v. Wark, Admx., 147 N.E. 170, 82 Ind. App. 618, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 261 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The only point which appellant undertakes to present is error of the court in admitting’ certain evidence. The only cause for a new-trial by which he undertakes to present this point is “for errors in admitting’ evidence to which defendant then and there excepted.”

Such an assignment presents no question. Causes for a new trial must be clear and specific so that the court will not need to search the record to find the alleged errors. Bayless v. Glenn (1880), 72 Ind. 5, 11; Staser v. Hogan (1889), 120 Ind. 207, 21 N. E. 911, 22 N. E. 990; Rees v. Blackwell (1893), 6 Ind. App. 506, 33 N. E. 938.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglass v. Phenix Insurance
33 N.E. 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Bayless v. Glenn
72 Ind. 5 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Staser v. Hogan
21 N.E. 911 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
Rees v. Blackwell
33 N.E. 988 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 N.E. 170, 82 Ind. App. 618, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowell-v-wark-admx-indctapp-1925.