Hollowell v. State
This text of 1971 OK CR 37 (Hollowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Wayne H. Hollowell, hereafter referred to as the defendant, was tried and convicted in the District Court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, for the offense of being In Actual Physical Control of a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, Second and Subsequent Offense; he was sentenced to serve one year imprisonment, pay a fine of $50.00, and costs of $44.40; and from that judgment and sentence he appeals.
The Attorney General filed his response to the petition in error in which he confesses error, that the judgment and sentence upon which the second and subsequent offense was predicated did not meet the requirements of Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319 (1967), and that defendant’s judgment and sentence should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment and sentence in case no. 6737, in the District Court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, shall be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1971 OK CR 37, 480 P.2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1971.