Hollowell v. Cole
25 Mich. 345, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 110
Opinion
held that the defendant in error was not the legal representative of his mother’s personal estate, and had no authority to present and collect the claim. The administrator upon his mother’s estate was the only competent person to enforce such claim.
Judgment below reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollowell v. Cole, 25 Mich. 345, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 110 (Mich. 1872).
25 Mich. 345 (Hollowell v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Koebke's Petition
64 N.W.2d 913 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1954)
Svitojus v. Kurant
292 N.W. 637 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Grand Rapids
247 N.W. 744 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Brobst v. Brobst
155 N.W. 734 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)
Morris v. Vyse
117 N.W. 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
McKenney v. Minahan
97 N.W. 489 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Cox v. Yeazel
68 N.W. 483 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Parks v. Crippin-Norris
59 N.W. 428 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Miller v. Clark
23 N.W. 35 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)
Murphy v. Hanrahan
7 N.W. 436 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)