Hollowell v. Cole
25 Mich. 345, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 110
This text of 25 Mich. 345 (Hollowell v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollowell v. Cole, 25 Mich. 345, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 110 (Mich. 1872).
Opinion
held that the defendant in error was not the legal representative of his mother’s personal estate, and had no authority to present and collect the claim. The administrator upon his mother’s estate was the only competent person to enforce such claim.
Judgment below reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Koebke's Petition
64 N.W.2d 913 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1954)
Svitojus v. Kurant
292 N.W. 637 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Grand Rapids
247 N.W. 744 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Brobst v. Brobst
155 N.W. 734 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)
Morris v. Vyse
117 N.W. 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
McKenney v. Minahan
97 N.W. 489 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Cox v. Yeazel
68 N.W. 483 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Parks v. Crippin-Norris
59 N.W. 428 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Miller v. Clark
23 N.W. 35 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)
Murphy v. Hanrahan
7 N.W. 436 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 Mich. 345, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowell-v-cole-mich-1872.