Hollowell v. Cheek
This text of 12 Ind. 614 (Hollowell v. Cheek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a bill in chancery, filed under the former practice, but tried since the taking effect of the present code. The cause was tried by the Court, and there was a finding and judgment, in respect to some matters involved, for the defendants. The complainants moved for a new trial, but no written reasons therefor appear to have been filed. The rulings alleged to have been erroneous, should have been presented as the ground of the motion for a new trial. Vide Kent v. Lawson, at the present term
There having been no written reasons for a new trial, filed in the Court below, no question is presented for con[615]*615sideration here. Howes v. Halliday, 10 Ind. R. 339. See, also, McGregor v. Axe, id. 362.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
See the last caso in this volume.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ind. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowell-v-cheek-ind-1859.