Hollowell v. Carter
574 P.2d 708, 32 Or. App. 597, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3147
This text of 574 P.2d 708 (Hollowell v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollowell v. Carter, 574 P.2d 708, 32 Or. App. 597, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3147 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
Opinion
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a layman has a legal right, by virtue of the justice court statutes, to act as an attorney for another in a municipal court.1 He does not. Balcom v. Municipal Court, 23 Or App 218, 541 P2d 1307, rev den (1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oregon State Bar v. Wright
573 P.2d 283 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1977)
Balcom v. Municipal Court
541 P.2d 1307 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
574 P.2d 708, 32 Or. App. 597, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowell-v-carter-orctapp-1978.