Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Hollowell v. Carter

Hollowell v. Carter

574 P.2d 708, 32 Or. App. 597, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3147
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 13, 1978·No. No. 77-156-L-3, CA 8993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether a layman has a legal right, by virtue of the justice court statutes, to act as an attorney for another in a municipal court.1 He does not. Balcom v. Municipal Court, 23 Or App 218, 541 P2d 1307, rev den (1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollowell v. Carter, 574 P.2d 708, 32 Or. App. 597, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3147 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

574 P.2d 708 (Hollowell v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oregon State Bar v. Wright
573 P.2d 283 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1977)
Balcom v. Municipal Court
541 P.2d 1307 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)