Hollowbrook Inn, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hollowbrook Inn, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

29 A.D.2d 954, 290 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 954 (Hollowbrook Inn, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollowbrook Inn, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 29 A.D.2d 954, 290 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the State Liquor Authority from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, made in Westchester County on October 25, 1967 and entered in Putnam County on November 8, 1967, as substituted the penalty of a 14-day suspension of petitioner’s hotel liquor license in place of the Authority’s cancellation of the license. Judgment modified, on the law, by increasing the period of suspension to 90 days. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. Reduction of the penalty from cancellation to suspension was warranted, but the period of suspension should have been fixed at 90 days. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the State Liquor Authority from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, made in Westchester County on October 25, 1967 and entered in Putnam County on November 8, 1967, as substituted the penalty of a 14-day suspension of petitioner’s hotel liquor license in place of the Authority’s cancellation of the license. Judgment modified, on the law, by increasing the period of suspension to 90 days. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. Reduction of the penalty from cancellation to suspension was warranted, but the period of suspension should have been fixed at 90 days. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 954, 290 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollowbrook-inn-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1968.