Holloway v. Wainwright

160 So. 2d 116
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1963
DocketNo. 33009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 So. 2d 116 (Holloway v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. Wainwright, 160 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration Holloway’s original petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking post-conviction relief against a verdict and judgment convicting him of the crime of grand larceny. We do not reach the merits of petitioner’s claims. A casual inspection of the record reveals that the petitioner has failed to exhaust the remedies provided and required as a condition to obtaining the relief now sought in this Court. The petition is therefore denied. See Criminal Procedure Rule #1; Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla., 155 So.2d 868.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuniga v. State
184 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 2d 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-wainwright-fla-1963.