Holloway v. State
This text of 178 S.W.2d 688 (Holloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
*107 Appellant was convicted of a nighttime burglary of a private residence, and by the jury given a term of five years in the penitentiary.
We find a purported statement of facts in the record, but same does not bear the approval of the judge of the court trying the case. Such approval is necessary before we can consider the same. See 4 Texas Jurisprudence, p. 425, Sec. 292.
We are unable to appraise the bills of exceptions in the absence of a statement of facts.
The indictment and all proceedings appear to be regular, and lacking a statement of facts we can not appraise the single bill of exceptions found in the record.
The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 S.W.2d 688, 147 Tex. Crim. 106, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-state-texcrimapp-1944.