Holloway v. State

962 So. 2d 383, 2007 WL 2212708
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 2007
Docket5D06-1355
StatusPublished

This text of 962 So. 2d 383 (Holloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. State, 962 So. 2d 383, 2007 WL 2212708 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

962 So.2d 383 (2007)

Keidrick T. HOLLOWAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D06-1355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 3, 2007.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PLEUS, J.

We affirm Holloway's judgment and sentence for manslaughter in all respects except one. We strike the $65 "Criminal Ordinance Program" fee imposed pursuant to section 939.185, Florida Statutes, because that statute took effect after the instant offense was committed. Mitchell v. State, 954 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

AFFIRMED; FEE STRICKEN.

LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. State
954 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Modha v. State
962 So. 2d 383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
962 So. 2d 383, 2007 WL 2212708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.