Holloway v. State

687 So. 2d 336, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1997 WL 43847
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 1997
DocketNo. 95-1736
StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 336 (Holloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. State, 687 So. 2d 336, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1997 WL 43847 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The testimony of its owner that he had purchased the stolen refrigerator for $449.93 a year and a half before the incident but did not know its present value was insufficient to support a conviction for grand theft, which requires a value of $300.00 or more. D.L. v. State, 546 So.2d 454 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and cases cited. Accordingly, the grand theft conviction is reduced to petit theft and the cause remanded for resentencing as to that crime. Because we find no merit to the defendant’s challenge to his burglary conviction, the judgment and sentence for that offense are affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.L. v. State
546 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 336, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1997 WL 43847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.