Holloway v. State

621 So. 2d 562, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7505, 1993 WL 261728
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1993
DocketNo. 92-03264
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 621 So. 2d 562 (Holloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. State, 621 So. 2d 562, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7505, 1993 WL 261728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. Counsel has filed an Anders brief1 in which he concedes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow appellant to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere. We agree.

Counsel does point out two problems with respect to the imposition of court costs. Appellant was assessed $233.00 pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1991), and $50.00 pursuant to section 960.-20, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 27.-3455 limits such assessments to $200.00 for felonies, while the version of section 960.20 in effect at the time of appellant’s offenses calls for court costs of only $20.00. After remand the trial court should correct the judgment accordingly.

Convictions and sentence affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franca v. State
658 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Tyll v. State
638 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 So. 2d 562, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7505, 1993 WL 261728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.