Holloway v. State
This text of 621 So. 2d 562 (Holloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. Counsel has filed an Anders brief1 in which he concedes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow appellant to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere. We agree.
Counsel does point out two problems with respect to the imposition of court costs. Appellant was assessed $233.00 pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1991), and $50.00 pursuant to section 960.-20, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 27.-3455 limits such assessments to $200.00 for felonies, while the version of section 960.20 in effect at the time of appellant’s offenses calls for court costs of only $20.00. After remand the trial court should correct the judgment accordingly.
Convictions and sentence affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 So. 2d 562, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7505, 1993 WL 261728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.