Holloway v. Kirby

966 F.2d 1458, 1992 WL 139348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 1992
Docket91-3477
StatusUnpublished

This text of 966 F.2d 1458 (Holloway v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. Kirby, 966 F.2d 1458, 1992 WL 139348 (8th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

966 F.2d 1458

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Winston HOLLOWAY, Appellant,
v.
Dareld KIRBY, Assistant Super- intendent of Treatment;
Larry Norris; Becky Nolan, Mental Health
Services; M.V. Knight, Employee,
Cummins Unit, Arkansas
Department of
Correction,
Appellees.

No. 91-3477.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 3, 1992.
Filed: June 24, 1992.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Winston Holloway filed a motion for contempt seeking enforcement of an order the district court issued in 1981. The court denied the motion, and Holloway appeals.

This court reviews the denial of a contempt motion for abuse of discretion. Davis v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 271, 272 (8th Cir. 1989) (per curiam), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 (1990). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in this case. The district court correctly observed that Holloway is not precluded from bringing a new action for damages for any harm caused by the defendants' noncompliance with the 1981 order.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 F.2d 1458, 1992 WL 139348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-kirby-ca8-1992.