Holloway v. Kelley
This text of 612 F. App'x 860 (Holloway v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate Harold Holloway appeals several orders of the district court,1 [861]*861including the dismissal without prejudice of his civil-rights suit for failure to comply with a court order to file an amended complaint, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). After careful review, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the civil-rights suit, see Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir.2008); in denying Holloway’s request to consolidate a habeas suit with the civil-rights suit; or in denying appointment of counsel, see Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-kelley-ca8-2015.