Holloway v. Holloway
This text of 393 So. 2d 213 (Holloway v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only issue involved in this matter concerns the amount of permanent alimony under C.C. art. 160, as amended by Act 72 of 1979, to be paid by the husband.
The issue of fault was litigated at the separation level.1
The record indicates that Mrs. Holloway has a 17 year old son born of a prior marriage and Mr. Holloway has two children born of a prior marriage. One child, age 7 years, was born of their marriage. Mrs. Holloway works part time and earns approximately $428.00 per month. Mr. Holloway earns $3,970.00 per month from his employment, plus a little over $200.00 per month from other activities.
The trial court, in a well-written opinion, considered all of the factors involved and awarded Mrs. Holloway $300.00 per month as alimony and $300.00 per month child support.
In view of Hope v. Hope, 271 So.2d 317 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972), an award of alimo[214]*214ny assessed against a husband for maintenance of his former spouse is within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. See also Wilmot v. Wilmot, 223 La. 221, 65 So.2d 321 (1953).
We find no evidence in the record of an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 213, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-holloway-lactapp-1980.