Holloway v. Holloway

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Holloway v. Holloway

393 So. 2d 1193, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19496

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1981

DocketNos. 80-525, 80-1022

StatusPublished

This text of 393 So. 2d 1193 (Holloway v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holloway v. Holloway, 393 So. 2d 1193, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered on rehearing is affirmed except insofar as it eliminates the award of permanent periodic alimony contained in the original final judgment. Under the circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to deny permanent alimony to the appellant-wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); G’Sell v. G’Sell, 390 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Since it appears that the $163.00 per month initially granted represents and was considered by the trial court to be a fair and adequate amount, we order that, after remand, this provision be inserted in the amended final judgment under review.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered on rehearing is affirmed except insofar as it eliminates the award of permanent periodic alimony contained in the original final judgment. Under the circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to deny permanent alimony to the appellant-wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); G’Sell v. G’Sell, 390 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Since it appears that the $163.00 per month initially granted represents and was considered by the trial court to be a fair and adequate amount, we order that, after remand, this provision be inserted in the amended final judgment under review.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 So. 2d 1193, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-holloway-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack