Holloway v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holloway v. Goord

279 A.D.2d 525, 720 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 363

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 525 (Holloway v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holloway v. Goord, 279 A.D.2d 525, 720 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 6, 1999, which confirmed the determination of a Hearing Officer, dated May 14, 1999, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating institutional rules and imposing a penalty.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The Hearing Officer’s determination was administratively reversed on October 12, 2000. Therefore, the proceeding must be dismissed as academic. Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 6, 1999, which confirmed the determination of a Hearing Officer, dated May 14, 1999, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating institutional rules and imposing a penalty.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The Hearing Officer’s determination was administratively reversed on October 12, 2000. Therefore, the proceeding must be dismissed as academic. Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 525, 720 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-goord-nyappdiv-2001.