Holloway v. Foti

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Holloway v. Foti

542 So. 2d 1379, 1989 La. LEXIS 1889, 1989 WL 50678

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 12, 1989

DocketNo. 89-CC-0789

StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 1379 (Holloway v. Foti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holloway v. Foti, 542 So. 2d 1379, 1989 La. LEXIS 1889, 1989 WL 50678 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Holloway, Allen; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 89-2449; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-0238.

[1380]*1380Granted. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for it to remand to the district court. The inmate is not to be denied access to the courts because of the lack of a notary unless notaries are available to the inmate. Until notaries are made available the rule requiring notarizing for inmates pleadings is suspended.

COLE, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Holloway, Allen; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 89-2449; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-0238.

[1380]*1380Granted. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for it to remand to the district court. The inmate is not to be denied access to the courts because of the lack of a notary unless notaries are available to the inmate. Until notaries are made available the rule requiring notarizing for inmates pleadings is suspended.

COLE, J., would deny the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

542 So. 2d 1379, 1989 La. LEXIS 1889, 1989 WL 50678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-foti-la-1989.