Holloway v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

557 So. 2d 611, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 650, 1990 WL 8591
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1990·No. No. 89-0006·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellants that the record reflects the existence of an issue of fact as to whether their claim is time barred. See Colon v. Celotex Corp., 465 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) quashed on other grounds, 523 So.2d 141 (Fla.1988); Ash v. Stella, 457 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1984).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holloway v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 557 So. 2d 611, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 650, 1990 WL 8591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 611 (Holloway v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Celotex Corp. v. Meehan
523 So. 2d 141 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Ash v. Stella
457 So. 2d 1377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Colon v. Celotex Corp.
465 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)