Holloway v. Appelget

55 N.J. Eq. 583
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMarch 15, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 N.J. Eq. 583 (Holloway v. Appelget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. Appelget, 55 N.J. Eq. 583 (N.J. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Van Syckel, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 9.

For reversal — Collins, Dixon, Ludlow, Bogert — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sun B. L. Assn. v. Rashkes
183 A. 274 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.
141 A. 755 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.J. Eq. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-appelget-njch-1897.