Holloman v. Brown

Fourth Circuit

Holloman v. Brown

332 F. App'x 887

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 24, 2009·No. No. 09-6510·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v. Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009; entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [888] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v. Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009; entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [888] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Holloman v. Brown, 332 F. App'x 887 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 887 (Holloman v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related