Holloman v. Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 24, 2009
Docket09-6510
StatusUnpublished

This text of Holloman v. Brown (Holloman v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloman v. Brown, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6510

LENNELL HOLLOMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JUDGE BROWN, Judge,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 24, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lennell Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v.

Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009;

entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Holloman v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloman-v-brown-ca4-2009.