Hollister v. Thomas
961 A.2d 419, 289 Conn. 956
This text of 961 A.2d 419 (Hollister v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollister v. Thomas, 961 A.2d 419, 289 Conn. 956 (Colo. 2008).
Opinion
Ronald HOLLISTER
v.
Edna THOMAS et al.
Ronald Hollister
v.
Action Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Hope C. Seeley, Hartford, and Sandra Snaden Kuwaye, in support of the petition.
J. Kevin Golger, Bridgeport, Karen K. Clark and Frank G. Usseglio, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn.App. 692, 955 A.2d 1212 (2008), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hollister v. Thomas
955 A.2d 1212 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
961 A.2d 419, 289 Conn. 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollister-v-thomas-conn-2008.