Hollister v. DeForest Wireless Telegraph Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hollister v. DeForest Wireless Telegraph Co.

47 Misc. 674, 94 N.Y.S. 504

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 47 Misc. 674 (Hollister v. DeForest Wireless Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollister v. DeForest Wireless Telegraph Co., 47 Misc. 674, 94 N.Y.S. 504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinions

Dugro, J.

Plaintiff failed to show a cause of action, among other things, in that he failed to prove by competent evidence that the defendant was a stock corporation, and had an office for the transaction of business or a transfer agent in this State; that it was not a moneyed or railroad corporation, and that he was a stockholder.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dugro, J.

Plaintiff failed to show a cause of action, among other things, in that he failed to prove by competent evidence that the defendant was a stock corporation, and had an office for the transaction of business or a transfer agent in this State; that it was not a moneyed or railroad corporation, and that he was a stockholder.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 Misc. 674, 94 N.Y.S. 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollister-v-deforest-wireless-telegraph-co-nyappterm-1905.