Hollister v. . Central National Bank of Troy
23 N.E. 878, 119 N.Y. 634, 74 Sickels 634, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
Opinion
Agree to affirm.
The following mem. being handed down :
“This case was argued in connection with the case of Ouderhirk v. Central National Bank of Troy * and is substantially similar to that case in its facts. Some differences exist in minor details, but none in the material facts controlling the decision, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed upon the authority of that case.”
All concur, Gray, J., in result.
Judgment affirmed.
*
Ante, p. 263.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollister v. . Central National Bank of Troy, 23 N.E. 878, 119 N.Y. 634, 74 Sickels 634, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1170 (N.Y. 1890).
23 N.E. 878 (Hollister v. . Central National Bank of Troy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.