Hollis v. State
This text of 63 S.E.2d 373 (Hollis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An indictment in two counts, the first charging robbery by force and intimidation, and the second charging robbery by “sudden snatching,” was returned against Sidney Hollis. His trial resulted in a verdict of guilty on the first count, and the jury fixed his punishment at not less than four, nor more than twenty years, in the penitentiary. His motion for new trial, based on the usual general grounds, was [582]*582amended by one additional ground, assigning error on the failure of the court to charge on robbery by sudden snatching. Held-.
1. The defendant was positively identified by the alleged victim and one other witness for the State as the perpetrator of the crime charged, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.
2. There being no evidence to sustain a verdict of robbery by sudden snatching, the trial judge properly excluded this charge in the indictment from consideration by the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E.2d 373, 207 Ga. 581, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-v-state-ga-1951.