Hollis v. State
This text of 196 So. 2d 758 (Hollis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was informed against, tried, -.and convicted for the offense of unlawfully -possessing narcotic drugs. A judgment of -conviction and sentence based upon the jury’s verdict forms the basis of this appeal.
Appellant’s sole point presented for our «consideration challenges the sufficiency of •’the evidence to support the verdict and judgment. We find in the record compe-•vtent and substantial evidence which, if 'believed by the jury, would be wholly sufficient to support its conclusion finding -appellant guilty as charged. Appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 So. 2d 758, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.