Hollis v. State

135 So. 645, 24 Ala. App. 387, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 35
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 17, 1931
Docket6 Div. 888.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 645 (Hollis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollis v. State, 135 So. 645, 24 Ala. App. 387, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 35 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon an indictment charging murder in the second degree, this appellant was convicted of the offense of manslaughter in the first degree, and from the judgment of conviction he appealed.

A large number of witnesses were examined in the court below. The killing complained of happened at a party where numerous persons were present. Pending the entire trial, no exception was reserved to any ruling of the court. The points of decision upon this ■appeal are confined solely to the action of the court in refusing several special written charges requested by defendant in the court below.

The court delivered an excellent oral charge covering several pages of this transcript. Every phase of the law applicable to this case was clearly, ably, and fairly stated to the jury by the court in this charge. In addition to the oral charge, the court gave, at the request of the defendant, a large number of special charges. An examination of the refused charges discloses, in many instances, they are mere repetitions of charges already given; and in each instance it appears that every proposition of law contained in the refused charges, where correctly stated, was fairly and substantially covered by the oral charge of the court and by the given charges. Where this clearly appears, the court is under no duty to give such charges, even though they contain correct propositions of law. Section 9509, Code 1923.

No error appears, and, as the record proper is regular in all things and without error, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 645, 24 Ala. App. 387, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-v-state-alactapp-1931.